« Oh, Oh, Oh My - Greg Wise Reading Persuasion | Main | Etiquette for the Street »

11/13/2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834517bcc69e20128759709ee970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Elinor vs. Marianne:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

For most of my life, I have been a Marianne. Like her, on days when I've been sick and sad, lonely and full of regret, I've wished that I were an Elinor. Ultimately, the best state is to be a reformed Marianne because then you become... Wait, who do you become? I thinking of a gorgeous older but not out of it woman, full of style and grace, and well respected by all, but occasionally dropping a hint about your adventurous past. The kind of woman who is the life the party and knows exactly when to leave and to trade the spangles for flannel pj's.

Marianne is so young in Sense and Sensibility. While she is flighty and overeager to share her feelings about everything, she also demonstrates an ability to learn from her folly. Her discussion with Elinor about Willoughby at the novel's end, and her good sense in recognizing Colonel Brandon's finer qualities and opening herself up to him, tell me that she will become an intriguing woman.

I would choose Marianne. It would be fun to go shopping with her or to have her over to tea or to listen to her on the pianoforte. If I am sick or need mothering, I will call on Elinor.

If I ever needed to confide something I would want Elinor for my friend. While she may seem boring, she has a strong character. Perhaps she would have allowed the more interesting side of her personality to develop if she had not had to live with the consequences of her mother's and Marianne's excessive sensibilities. Perhaps she felt like she had to stifle her emotions because there was such an abundance of them in her family.

However, with Marianne for a friend there would never be a dull, or a silent, moment. I don't know how much friendship you would experience, though, because she seems so self centered.

Without a doubt, I choose Elinor. I just don't care for Marianne very much. I think she's silly. And selfish. Not entirely selfish-- she certainly and sincerely loves her family, and shows it-- but (until the end), she really doesn't consider other people's wants and feelings, which isn't a very appealing quality in a friend. And I just can't find the wild, tumultous, groundless romantic idea of love as imagined from books to be as compelling as the quiet but passionately felt kinship of two people who can't be together because their sense of honor can't allow it.

I like Catherine's comment. Having grown up with a mother and two sisters who were & are 24x7 drama queens, I'm more of an Elinor & happy to be, much as I treasure my Marianne-like friends.

I think I am definitely more like Elinor. I love romance but when I think I'm pretty practical. I consider money and comfort over Marianne; I'm not really a fly by the seat of the pants kind of girl. I really enjoy Marianne's character though, and I get annoyed with Elinor for doing things that I know I would do... which is how I know I am like her haha. They always say what you hate in other people is what you don't like in yourself.

I could be Elinor's friend but I am entirely Marianne. No moderation!

I'm a bit of a combo: I love adventure and can lose myself in imagination, but I never lose my head in real life and am often a go-to girl for my friends. I'd think I'd rather be friends with Ellinor. Yes Marianne would be interesting but in a lot of ways she's incredibly selfish...or rather self-centered (meaning for lots of the novel she doesn't have a concept of the world outside herself). And to me Ellinore is also very interesting! She hides a "grande passion" while keeping her family together. Quiet doesn't translate to boring to me. I think she's the most complex character in the story and I get the opinion that if one were bossom friends with her, one would be surprised at how much she had to share. Who knows what passions or pursuits she has! She's never had the opportunity to explore them, I feel, with a father much, much older than her mother, the mother obviously favoring Marianne and having moments of extreme silliness that Ellinore has to mediate, and a youngest sister who she seems to take the lead in looking after. Her entire life was constrained by the desires of other people. Maybe she liked Edward because he saw and loved her as a complete person instead of merely a service-giver.

I would most definitely choose Elinor. Elinor would be that steadfast, devoted friend you could always count on. I have read Sense and Sensibility more than a few times and each time, I find myself aligned with Elinor! In fact, I usually find that Marianne irritates me to no end! I've often wondered if Miss Austen considers Elinor (and perhaps Anne Elliot) the characters closest to herself?

Thanks, everyone, for your great comments. I see Marianne and Elinor in myself as well - usually the wrong one at the wrong time. And, I agree, Elinor probably is a lovely, warm friend when you get to know her, my issue was taken with Austen for not revealing enough of that side, for making her play so much the stiff, moral part, despite her fairly controlled outburst at the end, and not allowing us to see the fullness of Elinor's character/person.

I am reading S&S at present but also lunged ahead and watched the film with Kate Winslow as Marianne this past weekend. I have to admit I like both women, but if I had to choose one, I would choose Marianne. It seems like she enjoys life more and her foibles are forgivable as she is young and fairly innocent. Her marriage at the end to an older but deeply loving man who appreciated her AS SHE WAS was really wonderful. To me, that was truly romantic. However, I do have my Elinor moments, especially when dealing with difficult situations. It's so much easier to suck it up and not show someone how I am feeling, and not having to deal with the additional situation of having people react to my feelings is quite helpful at times. It would be nice if we could be Mariannes, but life deems that we be Elinors.

My sister and I have had this conversation! We agreed that I am more like Elinor and she is similar to Marianne. Marianne's romantic nature almost killed her, which if it did would have been a tragedy for her family. I love how Austen deconstructed Romanticism in Sense and Sensibility by showing how destructive it can be if it is taken to the extreme. I have always related to Elinor as an older sister, who has had to put her own feelings aside at times to be there for others. In the end, her reserve and practicality win when Edward is finally free to propose marriage. Marianne finds solace with Colonel Brandon, but not before suffering near death...I understand heartbreak, but NO ONE is worth all of that torture. So while some may say Elinor is boring, I think women like her fare much better in life than those similar to Marianne.

Thanks for opening this discussion!

I know I'm terribly late in responding, but I've just discovered your inspirational blog (it has me thinking about my own course of study!). I say Elinor. You wrote about Elinor's secret-ness, how she confides in no one -- in whom should she confide? Marianne, her mother, the dreadful Miss Steele? There is no one -- except all of us reading -- to whom she can open her heart. Marianne would be fun to read poetry and Shakespeare with, or go off on a shopping spree, but for long-term friendship, I'll be with Elinor. Katherine Louise (herself the older sister)

Maybe Elinor and Marianne's contrasting characteristics are why they are together in the first place (besides the fact that they are sisters).
I am definitely more of an Elinor, but I like having friends who are like Marianne. They would cheer me up.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

My Photo

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

About Chris Stewart

  • Bio
    I'm program director for literary arts for my state arts council. I direct the state Poetry Out Loud program for the NEA. I have degrees. I teach writing. I've published my work. I write novels, poetry, and plays. I love chocolate, am talkative, a realist and idealist, prefer flannel to silk, am a real blonde, and consider books my life - reading them, writing them, smelling them, tasting them (yeah, I've licked a page or two in my time. Who hasn't?).

What I'm Reading

  • Claire Tomalin: Jane Austen, A Life. Vintage Books, New York, 1997.
  • Jane Austen: Northanger Abbey, with intro by Alfred Mac Adam, Columbia University. Barnes & Noble classic, New York, 2005. (1818)
  • Ann Radcliffe: The Mysteries of Udolpho with intro by Samuel Taylor Coleridge. Dover Publications, New York, 2004 (originally G.G. and J. Robinson, London, 1794 and titled: The Mysteries of Udolpho, A Romance; Interspersed with Some Pieces of Poetry.
  • Jane Austen's Letters - collected and edited by Deirdre Le Faye. Originally published Oxford University Press, 1995; this edition: The Folio Society, 2003

What I've Read

  • Jane Austen: Mansfield Park, with intro by Amanda Claybaugh, Columbia University. Barnes & Noble classic, New York, 2004 (1814)
  • Jane Austen: Sense and Sensibility with intro and notes by Laura Engel. A Barnes and Noble Classics Book. New York, 2004. (1811)
  • Jane Austen: Emma, A Signet Classic with an Afterword by Graham Hough. The New American Library of Canada, Limited, 1964.
  • Jane Austen: Pride and Prejudice -The World's Classics edition, edited by James Kinsley, with intro by Isobel Armstrong. Oxford University Press, 1990.